On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 11:06:35PM -0800, Chris Grigg wrote: > >- Events can be marked as the beginning or end of a gesture, for the > >purpose of facilitating automation recording by plugins. A marked > >event is otherwise identical to an unmarked event, and the gesture > >markings can be ignored by the plugin. > > This has a lot going for it, including removing any need for a > 'kWantsGestureEvents' mechanism. Not preventing a plug from doing I don't think a "wants gestures" flag is needed. You get gestures. If you don't want them, ignore them. > do) was part of my original concern. Is it OK with everyone that > there's no bulletproof way to signal that changes to more than one > control are intended to be part of the same gesture? One of the big wins I see in gestures is the ability to CORRECTLY undo something like an X/Y movement. Without that, I think the simple event-interval-timeout algorithm or something simple is just fine. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission. Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe