Steve Harris wrote:
On Wed, Dec 24, 2003 at 09:50:44 -0700, Mike Berry wrote:
I that sitatuion I would expect the modular GMPI host to handle the touch automation, and hand pre-merged control data to the sequencer plugin.
What if the modular host does not even record automation and only the sequencer plugin does? If you don't pass down the gesture data, you force all automation to always be handled at the top layer. This would be a significant blow to nestability.
I dont see it that way - either all hosts handle automation, or none do (it would be too confusing otherwise). I dont think we want every plugin that receives events handling its own automation. Granted the "modular GMPI host" is small by host standards, but it should still perform all the host functions.
-- Mike Berry Adobe Systems
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
