Until we know the exact variation of the aether (the PD graph) we can't say what the net effect will be . The aether near the Earth is stronger than near the Moon, but the light travels through more of the westbound aether. I await the bud-nipping answer. RB !st of all your assertions are theory, which is open to debate, as is most things we debate here. I am not clear as to whether you claim 3 different mechanisms of aether, or three different movements of the same mechanism. The latter seems likely if you allow that all are responsible for the propagation of radiation. However if what you said is true, with regard to the aether I assume you have these circling the Earth, this effect will have negligible effect in my experiment 3 which is to detect or not detect the forward motion of the earth/moon round the sun at 30k. I might add that when I first saw you mention 3 aethers, I thought you were grasping at straws to explain anomalies you could not answer with only one. Or maybe you just got a plus in there that was meant to be a minus.. Philip. ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert Bennett To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Friday, August 03, 2007 1:43 PM Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth deception From: philip madsen All I need now is for Robert to come and say my beam is not stationary, but moves with the aether drift.. I already got my answer to nip that in the bud. even if he was right . HE He He Ho Ho.. I'm not Phul. Yes, the beam is subject to the eastbound aether #2 when < GSD and the west bound aether between GSD and the Moon. Until we know the exact variation of the aether (the PD graph) we can't say what the net effect will be . The aether near the Earth is stronger than near the Moon, but the light travels through more of the westbound aether. I await the bud-nipping answer. RB ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.2/933 - Release Date: 2/08/2007 2:22 PM