[geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth deception

  • From: Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 11:19:31 -0700 (PDT)

These are also good ref and background for EMR and aether effects 

Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:    Thanks Nevile, Yes 
1919.......i forgot ...these are very short and relevant background..please 
  This is one of the reasons Bouw assumes a Wobble in the universe with the 
period of the suns anual motion to account for these paralax issues as well as 
the near and far distance relationship to the earth and sun..AKA the seasons 
  Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The "famous" solar eclipse to which you are probably refering is the one that 
Eddington used to promote OneStone to sainthood, 1919.

Why does the universe have to "wobble ... to account for the seasons"?


    -----Original Message-----
From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth deception

      Yes, the beam is subject to the eastbound aether #2 when < GSD and the 
west bound aether between GSD and the Moon.
  Until we know the exact variation of the aether (the PD graph)  we can't say 
what the net effect will be . The aether near the Earth  is stronger than near 
the Moon, but the light travels through more of the westbound aether. 
  I await the bud-nipping answer.
  I agree in principle. However, i think you are going to find at the end of 
the day that the aether effects on EMR are slightly different then on mass that 
is to say the amount of deflection/ force will not match exactly....Dr Hanson 
also proposed this and i asked him about it based on the necessity of a light 
trajectory change due to parallax if you assume the earth at the exact center 
with no wobble in the universe to account for the seasons.......I think you are 
going to have to incorporated more data then just the PD diagram to extrapolate 
the aether bending effects on EMR(light) . I might also suggest using the 
effects of "gravitational lenseing" ( although it would not caused by gravity 
but by gravities medium) effect might be a lousy source for hard data but 
perhaps a good ball park or indicator for the amount of EMR deflection due to 
travailing though a medium of varying currents. The problem you will ultimately 
encounter is that in order to know the exact amount
 oyou going to need to know the source and every current of every CB it passes 
though and to know that you will need the motions of every one of those CB?s.. 
I think you might be able to use the famous 1911( did i get the date right?) 
Solar eclipse data ..? There you would have a known source and a known Body and 
the motions of the two...This should give you the amount of EMR defection due 
to passing through the Aether medium of differing currents. In any case EMR may 
not be affected in the same way or to the same degree that mass is...energy and 
mass or two entirely different states within the aether .. 

    One-click Webmail Access - Easily monitor & access your email accounts!
Visit http://www.inbox.com/notifier and check it out!

Other related posts: