[geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth deception

  • From: Neville Jones <njones@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 10:31:15 -0800

This is the modified Tychonic model, but I feel no necessity to tie the stars to the Sun.

Parallax and aberration can simply be current motion within the aether, perhaps as planetary motion is?


-----Original Message-----
From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 11:19:31 -0700 (PDT)
To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth deception

These are also good ref and background for EMR and aether effects perhaps........

Allen Daves <allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Nevile, Yes 1919.......i forgot ...these are very short and relevant background..please read.... 
This is one of the reasons Bouw assumes a Wobble in the universe with the period of the suns anual motion to account for these paralax issues as well as the near and far distance relationship to the earth and sun..AKA the seasons

Listen & Record Music from Internet Radio - Get Free Radio & MP3 Player & Recorder
Learn more at www.inbox.com/radio

Other related posts: