[geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth deception

  • From: "philip madsen" <pma15027@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 4 Aug 2007 08:54:32 +1000

Why does the universe have to "wobble ... to account for the seasons"?

When the sun goes North and south, do all the stars do likewise?  If so then 
the universe must have an annual vibration north and south..  I spose that is 
not a wobble. but an oscillation..  

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Neville Jones 
  To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Saturday, August 04, 2007 2:44 AM
  Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth deception


  The "famous" solar eclipse to which you are probably refering is the one that 
Eddington used to promote OneStone to sainthood, 1919.

  Why does the universe have to "wobble ... to account for the seasons"?


    -----Original Message-----
    From: allendaves@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Sent: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 08:30:27 -0700 (PDT)
    To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
    Subject: [geocentrism] Re: Moving Earth deception

    Yes, the beam is subject to the eastbound aether #2 when < GSD and the west 
bound aether between GSD and the Moon.
    Until we know the exact variation of the aether (the PD graph)  we can't 
say what the net effect will be . The aether near the Earth  is stronger than 
near the Moon, but the light travels through more of the westbound aether. 
    I await the bud-nipping answer.

    I agree in principle. However, i think you are going to find at the end of 
the day that the aether effects on EMR are slightly different then on mass that 
is to say the amount of deflection/ force will not match exactly....Dr Hanson 
also proposed this and i asked him about it based on the necessity of a light 
trajectory change due to parallax if you assume the earth at the exact center 
with no wobble in the universe to account for the seasons.......I think you are 
going to have to incorporated more data then just the PD diagram to extrapolate 
the aether bending effects on EMR(light) . I might also suggest using the 
effects of "gravitational lenseing" ( although it would not caused by gravity 
but by gravities medium) effect might be a lousy source for hard data but 
perhaps a good ball park or indicator for the amount of EMR deflection due to 
travailing though a medium of varying currents. The problem you will ultimately 
encounter is that in order to know the exact amount oyou going to need to know 
the source and every current of every CB it passes though and to know that you 
will need the motions of every one of those CB’s.. I think you might be able to 
use the famous 1911( did i get the date right?) Solar eclipse data ..? There 
you would have a known source and a known Body and the motions of the 
two...This should give you the amount of EMR defection due to passing through 
the Aether medium of differing currents. In any case EMR may not be affected in 
the same way or to the same degree that mass is...energy and mass or two 
entirely different states within the aether .. 


  One-click Webmail Access - Easily monitor & access your email accounts!
  Visit http://www.inbox.com/notifier and check it out!


  No virus found in this incoming message.
  Checked by AVG Free Edition. 
  Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.11.2/933 - Release Date: 2/08/2007 
2:22 PM

Other related posts: