[geocentrism] Re: Challenge
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jandj.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 20:09:32 +0100
Dear Mike,
This is what I'm trying to do. I'm questioning much of what is considered
standard science.
O.K. My question about Einstein - As I understand the history of this, the
scientific world was jittery about the null results from number of
interferometer experiments starting with the Michaelson-Morley experiment
and including the Michaelson-Gale, the Sangnac and so on. The scientists of
the time did everything they could to try and find fault with the results.
As each argument was put forward so each experiment was changed to
accommodate the argument, it made no difference the results were still null.
What I shall endeavour to do on this forum is go back to basics and examine
as many assumptions and adhoc theories that modern astronomy is based on.
The above is just for starters.
My 2nd question is suggesting that if it is only particle physics that is
supposedly confirming Einstein, then it needs to be looked at closer. How
many results are discarded and how many give the desired result? Would you
ever get the truth?
----- Original Message -----
From: <geocentric@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, July 30, 2004 4:13 PM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: ChallengeIf you think
> the earth is the centre of the universe in some specail sense then why
> don't you explain to us exactly how you have come to this conclusion and
> where conventional wisdom has failed us.
>
> Regards,
> Mike.
>
> Jack Lewis wrote:
> >> Also, the stars would be travelling faster than light, which is
> >>impossible according to Einstein's theory of relativity.
> >
> >
> > Question 1
> > What was Einstein's basis for formulating his theory?
> >
> >
> >> I suppose you will say that you don't accept Newton's laws, or
the
> >>theory of relativity, (which have been supported by all the experiments
so
> >>far carried out). >
> >
> >
> > Question 2
> > What are these experiments - are they to do with particle physics?
> >
> > Jack
> >
> >
>
>
Other related posts:
