[geocentrism] Re: Challenge/
- From: Alan Griffin <ajg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 10:00:28 +0100
On 28 Jul, Knarr <knarrrj@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> A first requirement, it seems to me, would be to explain the moon's
> shadow during an eclipse. If this cannot be done by the heliocentrists
> then to debate the causes of more distant objects is just a futile
> exercise. (I think it would be futile in any case, but to each his
> own.)
It CAN be done by the heliocentrists! I have done it! Try drawing
a scale diagram. I'm afraid that Neville's argument is flawed, and he has
made a mistake.
And what a ridiculous argument, postulating that red shifts change
regularly because the speed of light changes regularly. You have
absolutely no proof. It's an "Alice through the looking glass" conjecture.
Alan Griffin
Other related posts:
