Julie Krueger wrote: "Remember Rodney King? I believe the officers in question were ultimately found innocent but let's imagine that they had mercilessly beaten Rodney when he had ceased to resist. They had every power to do that. They had absolutely no right to do that." Nonsense. Policing authorities, even guards at Gitmo, are found to have exceeded their powers in acting abusively so it is silly to say that whatever they do is what they had the power to do. The point of the court action was to discern whether the police were empowered, that is had the right, to do what they did. If they had 'absolutely no right to do that' then they would have been found guilty because they did not have the power to act as they did. Julie's confusion lies in equating 'power' with what the individuals are physically able to do. Sincerely, Phil Enns Toronto, ON ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html