>Affording the land by the UN is small consolation. It's still taken, >and it's still gone, and the Palestinians are still starving at this very > moment. It's strange how people who despise the UN the rest of >the time (I'm not saying you do I don't, I support the UN against its detractors (not always, obviously; it depends on the issue) and have -- I thought -- on this list. As for "at this moment", my point concerns the land granted in 1947. >We still live in a world where might makes right I know. I oppose that. But once land has been taken/given it may be that compensation is a better form of restitution than (re-)seizure. >and the U.S. is supplying them with plenty of rights. I think you mean "arms" Judy Evans, Cardiff ----- Original Message ----- From: Andy Amago To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, July 27, 2006 1:39 PM Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: U.N. Special Committee on Palestine Affording the land by the UN is small consolation. It's still taken, and it's still gone, and the Palestinians are still starving at this very moment. It's strange how people who despise the UN the rest of the time (I'm not saying you do but an awful lot of people do) will turn to the UN as their authority in this. We still live in a world where might makes right. If you can steal it (or have someone else steal it and give it to you), and your gun is big enough, then you're in the right. Or, conversely, if your gun is big enough, as in WWII, and you can get it back, then you're in the right. So we'll just have to wait and see how Israel's right plays out. They're working on it even at this very moment, and the U.S. is supplying them with plenty of rights.