[lit-ideas] Re: U.N. Special Committee on Palestine
- From: "Andy Amago" <aamago@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2006 17:59:02 -0400
Phil also wisely said I'm a shitface, which I see you didn't repeat. Why
is that Robert? It's curious that instead of giving a substantive answer,
or proving your superiority by ignoring my troll-like post, you dive in
with both feet into the mire. You go, guy. Is this your way of saying you
don't know the philosophical underpinning of lusting in one's heart? Can
you not lead by example or do you simply enjoy feeding the troll?
> [Original Message]
> From: Robert Paul <rpaul@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: 7/27/2006 5:42:46 PM
> Subject: [lit-ideas] Re: U.N. Special Committee on Palestine
>
> Irene wrote:
>
> > What's the difference between conquered and stole, except one uses
> > violence and the other uses craft? You're saying it's okay if one
> > uses violence to acquire something? It looks like the only thing
> > people understand is, I took it, it's mine, get over it. Carol,
> > you're making the perfect argument for a WWIII. And the Jews weren't
> > forced out of Palestine. They lived there just fine until they
> > wanted it for themselves. And because the Jews were forced out of
> > every country, that's the precedent for forcing the Palestinians out
> > of theirs? Where's the high moral ground? If the Jews have a right
> > to defend themselves, why don't the Arabs?
> >
> > All this proves is that Israel has no moral grounding for its
> > existence. I hope you think WWIII is worth fighting over Israel's
> > right to exist instead of coexist, which no doubt you do.
>
> A few months ago, Phil Enns wisely said, 'Do not feed the troll.' It's
clear
> that Irene's responses are meant only to arouse emotions, to anger and to
> frustrate those who take her questions as anything more than rhetorical
> devices
> into replying to her as if she were engaging in serious dialogue and were
> amenable to rational discourse. Nothing, folks, will ever count as an
> answer to
> her, nothing will count as evidence. She loves this stuff. She'll never
> change.
> She has no serious interest in these questions. Her interest lies in
provoking
> others.
>
> Robert Paul
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
> digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
------------------------------------------------------------------
To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off,
digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html
Other related posts:
