My mistake. I meant to say 0 to 255. John On Mon, Jul 02, 2012 at 04:10:03PM +0100, Mesar Hameed wrote: > Hi John, > > On Mon 02/07/12,09:52, John J. Boyer wrote: > > UTF-8 in the opcode arguments would be a bad idea. Since the beginning, > > the character argument has accepted characters from 0 to 127 as valid. > > UTF-8 conflicts with this. > > According to the standard 0 to 127 is exactly the same for ascii and for > utf-8, so this is not a conflict. > > Wikipedia reitterates this: > > "The first 128 characters of Unicode, which correspond one-to-one with ASCII, > are encoded using a single octet with the > same binary value as ASCII, making valid ASCII text valid UTF-8-encoded > Unicode as well." > > from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8 > > I could dig up a more reputable source if its required. > > Thanks, > Mesar > For a description of the software, to download it and links to > project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com -- John J. Boyer; President, Chief Software Developer Abilitiessoft, Inc. http://www.abilitiessoft.com Madison, Wisconsin USA Developing software for people with disabilities For a description of the software, to download it and links to project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com