As I said in another message I can make the change in a short time. It probably won't delay anyone's work. Since I have already started I would prefer to go ahead. John On Wed, Jul 04, 2012 at 11:22:00AM +0200, Christian Egli wrote: > "John J. Boyer" <john.boyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > However, i want to see more of a consensus. So who else wants UTF-8 in > > the character argument of opcodes? It might be a good idea to start a > > new thread with this question. > > As a sighted reader I prefer UTF-8 to \xhhhh notation. However I'm with > Bert on this that this is not a top priority as we had a working > solution before. There were some tables in latin-1 and these worked > (maybe only if you use them to translate latin-1 text). Of course for > uniformity it would be nice if they were all in the same encoding. So I > would suggest to delay this until after we ship the 2.5 release (which > as it looks now might be sometimes in August because when most of us are > back from summer holidays). > > Thanks > Christian > > -- > Christian Egli > Swiss Library for the Blind, Visually Impaired and Print Disabled > Grubenstrasse 12, CH-8045 Zürich, Switzerland > For a description of the software, to download it and links to > project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com -- John J. Boyer, Executive Director GodTouches Digital Ministry, Inc. http://www.godtouches.org Madison, Wisconsin, USA Peace, Love, Service For a description of the software, to download it and links to project pages go to http://www.abilitiessoft.com