[ciphershed] Re: Website & publicity
- From: Rocki Hack <rocki.hack@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ciphershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 10:39:27 +0200
@srg: You already stated: "But it might move locations as development goes
on (thus breaking the link)."
https://github.com/CipherShed/CipherShed/blob/master/Release/Setup%20Files/TrueCrypt%20User%20Guide.pdf
It's not recommended to perma link to github but when you do, there is a
simple "trick".
Click on the above link and then hit "y".
This will give you a "real" perma link to to the commit and will work until
the commit is modified (should never happen).
Example:
https://github.com/CipherShed/CipherShed/blob/a03e565835e3ff66774a2a50946dc2290bcbc7d4/Release/Setup%20Files/TrueCrypt%20User%20Guide.pdf
2014-06-20 5:01 GMT+02:00 Niklas Lemcke - 林樂寬 <compul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 22:43:45 -0400
> Stephen R Guglielmo <srguglielmo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 10:34 PM, Niklas Lemcke - 林樂寬
> > <compul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Thu, 19 Jun 2014 17:47:33 -0400
> > > "Alain Forget" <aforget@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> * How-To:
> > >> ** I like your sentence here. However, could we change the second
> sentence to, "For a How-To on TrueCrypt, please see the TrueCrypt User
> Guide", and the last three words should like to our locally hosted copy
> (which I don't think yet exists) of the TrueCrypt User Guide, which you can
> download here:
> https://www.grc.com/misc/truecrypt/TrueCrypt%20User%20Guide.pdf
> > > Exactly, doesnt exist yet, which is why it's not a link yet. As soon as
> > > it exists I'll link it ;)
> >
> > You can always link to it in our GitHub? But it might move locations
> > as development goes on (thus breaking the link).
> > Direct Link:
> >
> https://github.com/CipherShed/CipherShed/blob/master/Release/Setup%20Files/TrueCrypt%20User%20Guide.pdf?raw=true
> >
> > >> ** I'm wondering if we should avoid using monikers/pseudonyms, at
> least on this public-facing site. Normal people aren't going to understand,
> and it's going to kind of look like we're trying to be anonymous-ish (yes,
> even though the mapping of pseudonyms to real names is on the About page.
> We can't assume everyone is going to bother looking that far).
> > > Yea, maybe.. I'll think about it.
> >
> > I've thought about that too. The public would like to see names, not
> > things like srg, WaywardGeek, PID0, compul. It makes sense and is
> > comfortable for us (and the majority of the internet community), but
> > maybe we should stick that stuff on the development wiki instead of
> > the main site?
> >
>
> Should we use full names or just first names? I tend to think full
> names would be better. But some people might not be comfortable with
> that.
>
>
>
> --
> Niklas
>
> At the time of writing, no warrants have ever been served to me, Niklas
> Lemcke, nor am I under any personal legal compulsion concerning the
> CipherShed project. I do not know of any searches or seizures of my
> assets.
>
Other related posts:
