I disagree with all of you to talk about this again ! We already spend many times about this long time ago and that's why I don't participate to this discussion. I really think that it's useless to talk about experience again. Sorry ! Ariel At 04:50 PM 5/7/2003 +0300, you wrote: >Hi, > > > > i disagree, i think that for every type of skill, reading a book > > > should only increase your your potential in that skill. this > > > just seems > > > more logical. > > > > I was going to argue with you, but I couldn't think of any examples where > > you could read something and instantly be as good at it as you would be > > after practicing it several times. Therefore, you must be right :) > >I think the key is in the golden mean of 2 approaches. >Yes - maybe reading the book is not rising your skill directly (except the >"reading" skill ;-)), >but who ever tried to read a book without trying to do something from this >book? >There are allways some sort of examples in good book - so reader should try >them WHILE READING IT. >Such a book is much like a teacher. But maybe not so good as living one. > >So I propose the following benefits of reading: > - gain some grow of potential > - skill is increased by some amout (maybe quite a bit) > > > > > - minimium skill limit for a book to be read. > > > - skill proportionality - they can read the book, but because they > > > dont understand it, they only gain a little but of knoledge from > > > it > > > > Sure, if the book is so far ahead of your current skill that you can't > > understand, you'll gain less, similarly, if the book is written at your > > current level, you'll gain little. This suggests there is a > > gaussian curve > > (bell shaped) centered around an "ideal" skill for learning from > > a book, and > > getting smaller if it's far far advanced, or not advanced enough for you. > > > > Sounds good. > >Great idea. But this is really good candidate to hide from players. >At least the "gaussian curve" calculation part. ;-) > >Andrey.