hey, > > i disagree, i think that for every type of skill, reading a book > > should only increase your your potential in that skill. this > > just seems > > more logical. > > I was going to argue with you, but I couldn't think of any > examples where > you could read something and instantly be as good at it as you > would be > after practicing it several times. Therefore, you must be right :) > > > - minimium skill limit for a book to be read. > > - skill proportionality - they can read the book, but > because they > > dont understand it, they only gain a little but of > knoledge from > > it > > Sure, if the book is so far ahead of your current skill that you can't > understand, you'll gain less, similarly, if the book is written at > yourcurrent level, you'll gain little. This suggests there is a > gaussian curve > (bell shaped) centered around an "ideal" skill for learning from a > book, and > getting smaller if it's far far advanced, or not advanced enough > for you. > > Sounds good. w00 -- i am teh smart ! - n30n [ http://n30n.amok.dk/ ]