[muglo] Re: Constitution
- From: Doug Bale <dougbale@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:08:22 -0800 (PST)
--- On Thu, 3/5/09, Ralph and Joan Winfield <jrwinfield@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In #5, shouldn't it be "a quorum" instead of
> "quorums"?
>
> Joan
Either way works, Joan. The intention was to acknowledge that attendance varies
from one meeting to meeting, and therefore the number of people necessary to
constitute a quorum would also vary - hence quorums, plural. However, making it
singular would serve the same purpose; people would have no trouble
understanding it to refer to the necessary number at any given meeting.
---
MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo>
Manage your account options at <//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>
Other related posts:
