Fine with me, Doug. My suggestion was not put forward too seriously. Bob On 16-Mar-09, at 6:56 PM, Doug Bale wrote: >> I conclude that Article 5.1 will now be: Only members of >> MUGLO are eligible to serve as officers. I now wonder whether >> "Only" should also be deleted. > > We think we should keep the "only." I've belonged to organizations in > the past that in one exigency or another called in specialists - a > lawyer in one case, an accountant in another - and added them > arbitrarily to their executives, supposedly as temporary measures, > even though neither would have qualified for membership in the > ordinary course of things. One of them stayed on for years, slowly > graduating from nuisance to obstruction before an insurrection turfed > him out. --- MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo> Manage your account options at <//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>