[muglo] Re: Constitution
- From: Bob McDaniel <rmcdaniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:10:21 -0400
Fine with me, Doug. My suggestion was not put forward too seriously.
Bob
On 16-Mar-09, at 6:56 PM, Doug Bale wrote:
>> I conclude that Article 5.1 will now be: Only members of
>> MUGLO are eligible to serve as officers. I now wonder whether
>> "Only" should also be deleted.
>
> We think we should keep the "only." I've belonged to organizations in
> the past that in one exigency or another called in specialists - a
> lawyer in one case, an accountant in another - and added them
> arbitrarily to their executives, supposedly as temporary measures,
> even though neither would have qualified for membership in the
> ordinary course of things. One of them stayed on for years, slowly
> graduating from nuisance to obstruction before an insurrection turfed
> him out.
---
MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo>
Manage your account options at <//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>
Other related posts:
