[muglo] Re: Constitution

  • From: Bob McDaniel <rmcdaniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 19:10:21 -0400

Fine with me, Doug. My suggestion was not put forward too seriously.

On 16-Mar-09, at 6:56 PM, Doug Bale wrote:

>> I conclude that Article 5.1 will now be: Only members of
>> MUGLO are eligible to serve as officers. I now wonder whether
>> "Only" should also be deleted.
> We think we should keep the "only." I've belonged to organizations in 
> the past that in one exigency or another called in specialists - a 
> lawyer in one case, an accountant in another - and added them 
> arbitrarily to their executives, supposedly as temporary measures, 
> even though neither would have qualified for membership in the 
> ordinary course of things. One of them stayed on for years, slowly 
> graduating from nuisance to obstruction before an insurrection turfed 
> him out.

MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo>
Manage your account options at <http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>

Other related posts: