As a relatively new and heretofore 'inactive' member, but one who reads posts with interest and culls very helpful information from them, I would like to voice a concern about the present discussion regarding which members should "qualify" to vote. It seems to me that some of those who are able to regularly attend meetings are suggesting that the group excludes those that cannot. Not only that, but to possibly exclude those who do not regularly contribute to posts. A spreadsheet to tally questions and answers supplied to streams? Yikes. Talk about shades of big brother! There are any number of reasons that would make it difficult, if not impossible, for the majority of members to attend meetings. "Lurkers," as we have been called in this stream, are every bit as interested in the community's concerns as those who have chosen, or are able to be, more active. Access to public discussion in an online venue is the primary reason I became a member, and I am concerned that a possible next step would be to exclude entirely from membership those users that choose not to engage on a level others deem "active." Perhaps they're just shy :) Enjoying the discussion, Mary --- MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo> Manage your account options at <//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>