On Mar 16, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Doug Bale wrote: > presumably, we have no "active" members. > >> I conclude that Article 5.1 will now be: Only members of >> MUGLO are eligible to serve as officers. > > We think we should keep the "only." The original thought in 1999 was that this definition would exclude such people that did not join Muglo, as it was, and is, a public site. The Constitution fell by the wayside recently as there was no acceptance of specific Article 5 changes. I have since rewritten 5.0 & will post it later tonight. TeeC --- MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo> Manage your account options at <//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>