[muglo] Re: Constitution

  • From: Tee Cashmore <teecashmore@xxxxxx>
  • To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 20:23:45 -0400

On Mar 16, 2009, at 6:56 PM, Doug Bale wrote:
> presumably, we have no "active" members.
>
>> I conclude that Article 5.1 will now be: Only members of
>> MUGLO are eligible to serve as officers.
>
> We think we should keep the "only."

The original thought in 1999 was that this definition
would exclude such people that did not join Muglo, as
it was, and is, a public site.

The Constitution fell by the wayside recently as there
was no acceptance of specific Article 5 changes. I have
since rewritten 5.0 & will post it later tonight.
TeeC

---
MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo>
Manage your account options at <//www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>



Other related posts: