[muglo] Re: Constitution

  • From: Doug Bale <dougbale@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: muglo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:08:22 -0800 (PST)

--- On Thu, 3/5/09, Ralph and Joan Winfield <jrwinfield@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In #5, shouldn't it be "a quorum" instead of
> "quorums"?
> Joan

Either way works, Joan. The intention was to acknowledge that attendance varies 
from one meeting to meeting, and therefore the number of people necessary to 
constitute a quorum would also vary - hence quorums, plural. However, making it 
singular would serve the same purpose; people would have no trouble 
understanding it to refer to the necessary number at any given meeting.
MUGLO information at <http://www.freewebs.com/muglo>
Manage your account options at <http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi>

Other related posts: