On 17/03/2008, Urias McCullough <umccullough@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Yes, I was actually of the opinion that "public source" is not a > license to re-use... It's often safer to provide public source and a > restrictive license enforceable by the copyright holders. Some people > might get all uppity about this - but it's generally how you protect > branding. Before this gets misinterpreted - I mean that the people who would get "uppity" would be those open-source zealots that believe EVERYTHING (including trademarked names, logos, artwork, etc.) will not like a restrictive license (think: Mozilla vs. Debian)... ----------------------------------------------------------------------- haiku-web@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Haiku Web & Developer Support Discussion List