[sparkscoffee] Re: Pissing on a dead enemy soldier

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 12:41:13 -0400

Lee
Sorry old fellar, if my original post didn't mention humble opinion then it 
 should of. However my
humble opinion and everyone elses still stands whether we or you were  
there or not. Any response to
five of my points?
 
Stanley
 
 
In a message dated 9/12/2014 12:09:00 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

Stan, your memory is  short. In your original  post there was no mention of 
your opinion humble or otherwise.  Since I  wasnt there,
I cant judge those soldiers... Neither can you.

On  9/12/2014 8:30 AM, (Redacted sender _Sblumen123@aol.com_ 
(mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx)  for DMARC)  wrote:


Lee
Scroll down and see my first three words, "My humble opinion...".  Aren't 
we all entitled to opinions?
"Pissing on a dead enemy soldier" has gotten me more responses on most  
anything I have posted?
 
1. How many of you reading this would piss on a dead enemy soldier if  you 
had the opportunity? 
2. How would you know what if any dirty crimes he might have committed  
other then doing his duty of
    trying to kill you?
3. What can you possibly accomplish by this? IN FACT some might  interpret 
this as an act of a coward?
4. Can you see the obvious dangerous reactions if such an event became  
public?
5. Don't you agree with me that it is best in all cases to treat a  dead 
body with respect and where
    possible give it a proper funeral of his  culture or at least bury it 
with a proper ID marker and keep a
    record of it to reduce the number of missing in  action cases the same 
as you would like the enemy
    to do for us? 
6. Enough said.
 
Stanley
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/11/2014 6:18:43 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
_pixiehat@charter.net_ (mailto:pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx)  writes:

My point Stan, is that you said that that was  something a professional 
soldier would not do...  It may not be  something you would want him to do. I 
can think of a number of  
professionals in my acquaintance that probably would have.  I  cant recall 
being in a position where I chose to take the time for such a  display.. Too 
busy surviving I guess.
You simply are not qualified to  say what a professional WOULD or even 
SHOULD do.  Having a drink  served by german soldiers certainly does not 
qualify 
 you.



Lee


On 9/11/2014 2:24 PM, (Redacted sender  _Sblumen123@aol.com_ 
(mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx)  for DMARC) wrote:


Pixie
My humble opinion, never ran across a dead enemy warrior but at an  
Officers Bar during or soon after WW2
I was told the bar tenders were all German POWs which was my only  personal 
contact with the enemy. By the way JS so far hasn't  confirmed that he ran 
across a dead enemy soldier? Would you piss  on a dead enemy soldier if you 
had the opportunity? I obviously  wouldn't.
 
Stanley
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 9/11/2014 4:49:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, 
_pixiehat@charter.net_ (mailto:pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx)  writes:

Just curious stan, how much experience do  you have as a professional 
soldier, or is this your opinion about what  a professional soldier would
do?



On 9/11/2014 12:07  PM, (Redacted sender _Sblumen123@aol.com_ 
(mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx)  for DMARC)  wrote:


JS
You are doing quite a bit of cherry picking of your own by not  replying to 
my direct questions. I still believe
pissing on any dead man, warrior or not is childish that a  professional 
soldier would not do under any circumstance. My  understanding is that cowards 
usually live by running away and  that is why they are called cowards. 
 
Comrade B.
 
 
In a message dated 9/11/2014 1:54:39 P.M. Eastern Daylight  Time, 
_schalestock@juno.com_ (mailto:schalestock@xxxxxxxx)  writes:

Stanley,
 
As usual, you seem to cherry pick a few words out of context  and ignore 
the total comment.
 
So let me put it another way. True warriors DO respect each  other . We 
hated the NVA but we respected them - right up to the  point they committed 
unnecessary atrocites on our men.
 
A warrior deals in death - both the enemy's and the  possibility of his 
own. This is accepted as part of the life  they have chosen. What is not 
accepted is the brutality of  cowards. Then payback comes in kind. Pissing on a 
coward's  corpse is sending a message to his friends that they are not  
respected as warriors or even as men.  But I don't really  expect you to get 
any 
of this.
 
JS
 


---------- Original Message ----------
From: "" _<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>_ 
(mailto:dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx)   (Redacted sender _"Sblumen123@xxxxxxx"_ 
(mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx)  
for DMARC)
To:  _chucksright@gmail.com_ (mailto:chucksright@xxxxxxxxx) 
Subject:  [sparkscoffee] Re: Pissing on a dead enemy soldier
Date: Thu,  11 Sep 2014 13:37:52 -0400

Chuck
You haven't heard of the Genieva Convention on the rules of  war? Per my 
item 3. I like to think that not even  all ISIS fighters believe in chopping 
off heads and mass  shooting of civilian men laying on the ground with their 
hands  tied behind their back plus I don't believe the dead soldier  pissed 
on was an ISIS? Anyhow not all of our enemy warriors  are the same. 
Incidentally how would any soldier know if the  dead enemy soldier before him 
had 
committed some terrible  crime? 
 
Stanley
 
 
In a message dated 9/10/2014 9:01:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight  Time, 
_chucksright@gmail.com_ (mailto:chucksright@xxxxxxxxx)  writes:

C'mon Stan, you want us to to do battle under the  Marquis of Queensbury 
rules while they kick us in the balls (or  should I say cut off our heads).  
You are blinded to the  facts by your loony Socialist philosophy.  

Chuck


On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:56 PM, <_Sblumen123@aol.com_ 
(mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx) >  wrote:


Attention John Shalestock, our house warrior
 
1. After some thought I am proposing that it is extremely  childish 
accomplishing  nothing except inviting  ridicule and endangering ones self and 
all 
comrades and  embarrassing our country making it more difficult to win a war 
 plus being counter to the Genieva Convention on warfare, even  if the dead 
soldier is a butcher murdering women and  children.
 
2. Those who did the pissing should be brought to trial  and if found 
guilty should be punished the same as
any other war time crime.
 
3. Not all enemy warriors are the same devils, some like  on our side will 
have doubts about the justification
of their war, some may even come over to our side or even  turn into spies 
for us?
 
4. It should be required training that all warriors  should be taught to 
treat prisoners and dead enemies  with
respect and where possible they should be given a funeral  of their culture 
regardless of their alleged crimes.
 
5. Remember Viet Nam where a squad took their vengence on  women and 
children which was a terrible
embarrassment to all of us.
 
Stanley








____________________________________________________________
_The #1 Worst Carb  Ever?
Click to Learn #1  Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar (Don't Eat  This!)
_ (http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5411e1a72660861a70b53st01vuc) 
_FixYourBloodSugar.com_ 
(http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5411e1a72660861a70b53st01vuc) 













Other related posts: