Just curious stan, how much experience do you have as a professional soldier, or is this your opinion about what a professional soldier would
do? On 9/11/2014 12:07 PM, (Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC) wrote:
JSYou are doing quite a bit of cherry picking of your own by not replying to my direct questions. I still believe pissing on any dead man, warrior or not is childish that a professional soldier would not do under any circumstance. My understanding is that cowards usually live by running away and that is why they are called cowards.Comrade B.In a message dated 9/11/2014 1:54:39 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, schalestock@xxxxxxxx writes:Stanley, As usual, you seem to cherry pick a few words out of context and ignore the total comment. So let me put it another way. True warriors DO respect each other . We hated the NVA but we respected them - right up to the point they committed unnecessary atrocites on our men. A warrior deals in death - both the enemy's and the possibility of his own. This is accepted as part of the life they have chosen. What is not accepted is the brutality of cowards. Then payback comes in kind. Pissing on a coward's corpse is sending a message to his friends that they are not respected as warriors or even as men. But I don't really expect you to get any of this. JS ---------- Original Message ---------- From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC) To: chucksright@xxxxxxxxx Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Pissing on a dead enemy soldier Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:37:52 -0400 Chuck You haven't heard of the Genieva Convention on the rules of war? Per my item 3. I like to think that not even all ISIS fighters believe in chopping off heads and mass shooting of civilian men laying on the ground with their hands tied behind their back plus I don't believe the dead soldier pissed on was an ISIS? Anyhow not all of our enemy warriors are the same. Incidentally how would any soldier know if the dead enemy soldier before him had committed some terrible crime? Stanley In a message dated 9/10/2014 9:01:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, chucksright@xxxxxxxxx writes: C'mon Stan, you want us to to do battle under the Marquis of Queensbury rules while they kick us in the balls (or should I say cut off our heads). You are blinded to the facts by your loony Socialist philosophy. Chuck On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:56 PM, <Sblumen123@xxxxxxx <mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx>> wrote: Attention John Shalestock, our house warrior 1. After some thought I am proposing that it is extremely childish accomplishing nothing except inviting ridicule and endangering ones self and all comrades and embarrassing our country making it more difficult to win a war plus being counter to the Genieva Convention on warfare, even if the dead soldier is a butcher murdering women and children. 2. Those who did the pissing should be brought to trial and if found guilty should be punished the same as any other war time crime. 3. Not all enemy warriors are the same devils, some like on our side will have doubts about the justification of their war, some may even come over to our side or even turn into spies for us? 4. It should be required training that all warriors should be taught to treat prisoners and dead enemies with respect and where possible they should be given a funeral of their culture regardless of their alleged crimes. 5. Remember Viet Nam where a squad took their vengence on women and children which was a terrible embarrassment to all of us. Stanley ____________________________________________________________ *The #1 Worst Carb Ever?* Click to Learn #1 Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar (Don't Eat This!) <http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5411e1a72660861a70b53st01vuc>FixYourBloodSugar.com <http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5411e1a72660861a70b53st01vuc>
