[sparkscoffee] Re: Pissing on a dead enemy soldier
- From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
- To: chucksright@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 17:11:22 -0400
Chuck
I appreciate that you take the trouble to respond however in a civil war
conflict one side does not have
a country till its over. I agree with you on ISIS but the others like
Alquaida (forget the misspelling) are not
generally as bad. No matter how you slice it, pissing on a dead man,
criminal, civilian or warrior is childish that a professional wont do and
accomplishes zip except creating bad news if it gets around. In the case at
hand
it wasn't ISIS to the best of my rememberance.
Stanley
In a message dated 9/11/2014 4:49:12 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
chucksright@xxxxxxxxx writes:
Stanley: Since you are so smart, don't you realize that the Geneva
Convention covers war between countries, AlQuaida and ISIS are not countries
but
are terrorists representing no country? These butchers deserve no mercy
or respect as they don't respect other people or combatants. Although I
don't want our soldiers to get down in the gutter with these animals (see I
didn't use the word humans), I think they don't deserve any mercy and should
be treated like they treat their adversaries. Stop the moral equivalance
crap. When they act like humans they will be treated like humans. Piss on
the whole bunch of them.
Chuck
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 1:37 PM, <_Sblumen123@aol.com_
(mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx) > wrote:
Chuck
You haven't heard of the Genieva Convention on the rules of war? Per my
item 3. I like to think that not even all ISIS fighters believe in chopping
off heads and mass shooting of civilian men laying on the ground with their
hands tied behind their back plus I don't believe the dead soldier pissed
on was an ISIS? Anyhow not all of our enemy warriors are the same.
Incidentally how would any soldier know if the dead enemy soldier before him
had
committed some terrible crime?
Stanley
In a message dated 9/10/2014 9:01:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
_chucksright@gmail.com_ (mailto:chucksright@xxxxxxxxx) writes:
C'mon Stan, you want us to to do battle under the Marquis of Queensbury
rules while they kick us in the balls (or should I say cut off our heads).
You are blinded to the facts by your loony Socialist philosophy.
Chuck
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:56 PM, <_Sblumen123@aol.com_
(mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx) > wrote:
Attention John Shalestock, our house warrior
1. After some thought I am proposing that it is extremely childish
accomplishing nothing except inviting ridicule and endangering ones self and
all
comrades and embarrassing our country making it more difficult to win a war
plus being counter to the Genieva Convention on warfare, even if the dead
soldier is a butcher murdering women and children.
2. Those who did the pissing should be brought to trial and if found
guilty should be punished the same as
any other war time crime.
3. Not all enemy warriors are the same devils, some like on our side will
have doubts about the justification
of their war, some may even come over to our side or even turn into spies
for us?
4. It should be required training that all warriors should be taught to
treat prisoners and dead enemies with
respect and where possible they should be given a funeral of their culture
regardless of their alleged crimes.
5. Remember Viet Nam where a squad took their vengence on women and
children which was a terrible
embarrassment to all of us.
Stanley
Other related posts:
