[sparkscoffee] Re: Pissing on a dead enemy soldier

  • From: "Lee, NI7I" <pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:18:19 -0700

My point Stan, is that you said that that was something a professional soldier would not do... It may not be something you would want him to do. I can think of a number of professionals in my acquaintance that probably would have. I cant recall being in a position where I chose to take the time for such a display.. Too busy surviving I guess. You simply are not qualified to say what a professional WOULD or even SHOULD do. Having a drink served by german soldiers certainly does not qualify you.




Lee


On 9/11/2014 2:24 PM, (Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx for DMARC) wrote:
Pixie
My humble opinion, never ran across a dead enemy warrior but at an Officers Bar during or soon after WW2 I was told the bar tenders were all German POWs which was my only personal contact with the enemy. By the way JS so far hasn't confirmed that he ran across a dead enemy soldier? Would you piss on a dead enemy soldier if you had the opportunity? I obviously wouldn't.
Stanley
In a message dated 9/11/2014 4:49:22 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

    Just curious stan, how much experience do you have as a
    professional soldier, or is this your opinion about what a
    professional soldier would
    do?



    On 9/11/2014 12:07 PM, (Redacted sender Sblumen123@xxxxxxx for
    DMARC) wrote:
    JS
    You are doing quite a bit of cherry picking of your own by not
    replying to my direct questions. I still believe
    pissing on any dead man, warrior or not is childish that a
    professional soldier would not do under any circumstance. My
    understanding is that cowards usually live by running away and
    that is why they are called cowards.
    Comrade B.
    In a message dated 9/11/2014 1:54:39 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
    schalestock@xxxxxxxx writes:

        Stanley,
        As usual, you seem to cherry pick a few words out of context
        and ignore the total comment.
        So let me put it another way. True warriors DO respect each
        other . We hated the NVA but we respected them - right up to
        the point they committed unnecessary atrocites on our men.
        A warrior deals in death - both the enemy's and the
        possibility of his own. This is accepted as part of the life
        they have chosen. What is not accepted is the brutality of
        cowards. Then payback comes in kind. Pissing on a coward's
        corpse is sending a message to his friends that they are not
        respected as warriors or even as men.  But I don't really
        expect you to get any of this.
        JS


        ---------- Original Message ----------
        From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender
        "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
        To: chucksright@xxxxxxxxx
        Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Pissing on a dead enemy soldier
        Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:37:52 -0400

        Chuck
        You haven't heard of the Genieva Convention on the rules of
        war? Per my item 3. I like to think that not even all ISIS
        fighters believe in chopping off heads and mass shooting of
        civilian men laying on the ground with their hands tied
        behind their back plus I don't believe the dead soldier
        pissed on was an ISIS? Anyhow not all of our enemy warriors
        are the same. Incidentally how would any soldier know if the
        dead enemy soldier before him had committed some terrible crime?
        Stanley
        In a message dated 9/10/2014 9:01:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight
        Time, chucksright@xxxxxxxxx writes:

            C'mon Stan, you want us to to do battle under the Marquis
            of Queensbury rules while they kick us in the balls (or
            should I say cut off our heads).  You are blinded to the
            facts by your loony Socialist philosophy.
            Chuck

            On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:56 PM, <Sblumen123@xxxxxxx
            <mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx>> wrote:

                Attention John Shalestock, our house warrior
                1. After some thought I am proposing that it is
                extremely childish accomplishing  nothing except
                inviting ridicule and endangering ones self and all
                comrades and embarrassing our country making it more
                difficult to win a war plus being counter to the
                Genieva Convention on warfare, even if the dead
                soldier is a butcher murdering women and children.
                2. Those who did the pissing should be brought to
                trial and if found guilty should be punished the same as
                any other war time crime.
                3. Not all enemy warriors are the same devils, some
                like on our side will have doubts about the justification
                of their war, some may even come over to our side or
                even turn into spies for us?
                4. It should be required training that all warriors
                should be taught to treat prisoners and dead enemies with
                respect and where possible they should be given a
                funeral of their culture regardless of their alleged
                crimes.
                5. Remember Viet Nam where a squad took their
                vengence on women and children which was a terrible
                embarrassment to all of us.
                Stanley



        ____________________________________________________________
        *The #1 Worst Carb Ever?*
        Click to Learn #1 Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar (Don't Eat
        This!)
        
<http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5411e1a72660861a70b53st01vuc>FixYourBloodSugar.com
        <http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5411e1a72660861a70b53st01vuc>



Other related posts: