[sparkscoffee] Re: Pissing on a dead enemy soldier

  • From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 15:07:53 -0400

JS
You are doing quite a bit of cherry picking of your own by not replying to  
my direct questions. I still believe
pissing on any dead man, warrior or not is childish that a professional  
soldier would not do under any circumstance. My understanding is that  cowards 
usually live by running away and that is why they are called  cowards. 
 
Comrade B.
 
 
In a message dated 9/11/2014 1:54:39 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
schalestock@xxxxxxxx writes:

Stanley,
 
As usual, you seem to cherry pick a few words out of context and ignore  
the total comment.
 
So let me put it another way. True warriors DO respect each other . We  
hated the NVA but we respected them - right up to the point they committed  
unnecessary atrocites on our men.
 
A warrior deals in death - both the enemy's and the possibility  of his 
own. This is accepted as part of the life they have chosen. What  is not 
accepted is the brutality of cowards. Then payback comes in kind.  Pissing on a 
coward's corpse is sending a message to his friends that they are  not 
respected as warriors or even as men.  But I don't really expect you  to get 
any of 
this.
 
JS
 


---------- Original Message ----------
From: ""  <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender 
"Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for  DMARC)
To: chucksright@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Pissing on  a dead enemy soldier
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 13:37:52 -0400

Chuck
You haven't heard of the Genieva Convention on the rules of war? Per my  
item 3. I like to think that not even all ISIS fighters believe in  chopping 
off heads and mass shooting of civilian men laying on the ground with  their 
hands tied behind their back plus I don't believe the dead soldier  pissed 
on was an ISIS? Anyhow not all of our enemy warriors are the same.  
Incidentally how would any soldier know if the dead enemy soldier before  him 
had 
committed some terrible crime? 
 
Stanley
 
 
In a message dated 9/10/2014 9:01:26 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
chucksright@xxxxxxxxx writes:

C'mon Stan, you want us to to do battle under the Marquis of  Queensbury 
rules while they kick us in the balls (or should I say cut off  our heads).  
You are blinded to the facts by your loony Socialist  philosophy.  

Chuck


On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 4:56 PM, <_Sblumen123@aol.com_ 
(mailto:Sblumen123@xxxxxxx) > wrote:


Attention John Shalestock, our house warrior
 
1. After some thought I am proposing that it is extremely  childish 
accomplishing  nothing except inviting ridicule and  endangering ones self and 
all 
comrades and embarrassing our country  making it more difficult to win a war 
plus being counter to the Genieva  Convention on warfare, even if the dead 
soldier is a butcher murdering  women and children.
 
2. Those who did the pissing should be brought to trial and if found  
guilty should be punished the same as
any other war time crime.
 
3. Not all enemy warriors are the same devils, some like on our side  will 
have doubts about the justification
of their war, some may even come over to our side or even turn into  spies 
for us?
 
4. It should be required training that all warriors should be  taught to 
treat prisoners and dead enemies with
respect and where possible they should be given a funeral of their  culture 
regardless of their alleged crimes.
 
5. Remember Viet Nam where a squad took their vengence on women and  
children which was a terrible
embarrassment to all of us.
 
Stanley








____________________________________________________________
_The #1 Worst Carb  Ever?
Click to Learn #1 Carb that  Kills Your Blood Sugar (Don't Eat This!)
_ (http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5411e1a72660861a70b53st01vuc) 
_FixYourBloodSugar.com_ 
(http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5411e1a72660861a70b53st01vuc) 

Other related posts: