It's not that hard to disagree with most of what you say Ron. You infer that by disagreeing with you, I endorse a ban on gun ownership. So far, i havent seen that on the table. Of course I dont subscribe to the same wing nug "news" groups as you. What I have said is that you do the "pro gun" position a disservice with you exagerations and manufactured facts. I have also said that we already have what I consider ample "gun laws" (federal). They simply arent enforced. Here there are few restrictions to gun ownership. It's inconvenient that I can only fire my mach9ine gun at designated ranges.
Lee On 2/3/2013 7:44 PM, Ron Ristad wrote:
Sorry I thought you were one of the ones who supports a gun ban and therefore would voluntarily give up your guns, since the only time I have ever seen a post from you was to disagree with something I said. -----Original Message-----From: "Lee, NI7I" <pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Feb 3, 2013 9:11 PM To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Marxism: Enemy of monogamy and the nuclear fami ly Once again your facts are wrong.. It seems to me that it is your custom to manufacture facts as it suites you. I am not "unarmed", nor am I defenseless. I have no idea (except maybe your imagination) where you got that information. You are a bit over confident if you think being armed necessarily means that you will survive. Of course you neglected to say what it was you were going to survive.. You can still lose armed with a gun in a knife fight. Lee On 2/3/2013 9:53 AM, Ron Ristad wrote:JS, I agree that those who are prepared to defend themselves will survive and prosper but history shows that the people who are murdered are the ones who are defenseless. So while you and I will probably survive, Stan, RG, Richard and Lee who are unarmed and defenseless are not going to fare as well. They'll likely be the first in line at the FEMA camp to get their free government assistance and "protection", LOL. -RR -----Original Message-----From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Feb 3, 2013 11:10 AM To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Marxism: Enemy of monogamy and the nuclear fami ly RR I agree with you on the reason so many senior military officers are being dismissed. But I think you missed my point on combat experience. I think of it more as an existential experience that transcends training or even discipline. Facing someone who is trying to kill you is as about as real as life gets. It changes the way you think about everything, not the least of which is blind obedience. That was the point I was trying to make. JS"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him, better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him, better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford
