Sorry I thought you were one of the ones who supports a gun ban and therefore would voluntarily give up your guns, since the only time I have ever seen a post from you was to disagree with something I said. -----Original Message----- >From: "Lee, NI7I" <pixiehat@xxxxxxxxxxx> >Sent: Feb 3, 2013 9:11 PM >To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Marxism: Enemy of monogamy and the nuclear fami >ly > >Once again your facts are wrong.. It seems to me that it is your custom >to manufacture facts as it suites you. >I am not "unarmed", nor am I defenseless. I have no idea (except maybe >your imagination) where you got that >information. You are a bit over confident if you think being armed >necessarily means that you will survive. Of course >you neglected to say what it was you were going to survive.. You can >still lose armed with a gun in a knife fight. > >Lee > > >On 2/3/2013 9:53 AM, Ron Ristad wrote: >> JS, >> I agree that those who are prepared to defend themselves will survive and >> prosper but history shows that the people who are murdered are the ones who >> are defenseless. So while you and I will probably survive, Stan, RG, Richard >> and Lee who are unarmed and defenseless are not going to fare as well. >> They'll likely be the first in line at the FEMA camp to get their free >> government assistance and "protection", LOL. >> >> -RR >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >>> From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx> >>> Sent: Feb 3, 2013 11:10 AM >>> To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Marxism: Enemy of monogamy and the nuclear fami >>> ly >>> >>> RR >>> >>> I agree with you on the reason so many senior military officers are being >>> dismissed. >>> >>> But I think you missed my point on combat experience. I think of it more >>> as an existential experience that transcends training or even discipline. >>> Facing someone who is trying to kill you is as about as real as life gets. >>> It changes the way you think about everything, not the least of which is >>> blind obedience. That was the point I was trying to make. >>> >>> JS >>> >> >> "Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government >> take care of him, better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry >> Ford >> > > "Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government take care of him, better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry Ford