[sparkscoffee] Re: Marxism: Enemy of monogamy and the nuclear fami ly
- From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:53:23 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
JS,
I agree that those who are prepared to defend themselves will survive and
prosper but history shows that the people who are murdered are the ones who are
defenseless. So while you and I will probably survive, Stan, RG, Richard and
Lee who are unarmed and defenseless are not going to fare as well. They'll
likely be the first in line at the FEMA camp to get their free government
assistance and "protection", LOL.
-RR
-----Original Message-----
>From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Feb 3, 2013 11:10 AM
>To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: Marxism: Enemy of monogamy and the nuclear fami
>ly
>
>RR
>
>I agree with you on the reason so many senior military officers are being
>dismissed.
>
>But I think you missed my point on combat experience. I think of it more as
>an existential experience that transcends training or even discipline. Facing
>someone who is trying to kill you is as about as real as life gets. It changes
>the way you think about everything, not the least of which is blind obedience.
> That was the point I was trying to make.
>
>JS
>
"Any man who thinks he can be happy and prosperous by letting the government
take care of him, better take a closer look at the American Indian." - Henry
Ford
Other related posts:
