In the air above the pond I read the Financial Times which is a much better paper than I remember. The writers seemed to want to find interesting ways to say things. Not "believers," but "god-botherers." Imagine that in your paper! An ad copywriter, for a company that "hunted profits," described the prey's skeleton, "skull, neck vertebrae, bendy bit, spine, ribcage, pelvis, hip, even bendier bit, tail, end of tail." Brits like bits; orange juice is marketed, "with bits." There were theories, "We are 'aquatic apes'," one writer explained, "who--some scientists claim--evolved not for the savannah, but for the shallow coastal waters where our brains grew large and thoughtful on the fatty acids of shellfish." And ghost headlines--beneath a tale of Bannockburn's modern politics was the story of challenges to Prizer's Viagra patent. Neither headline writer mentions rising again, but they were tempted. I learned that Albania's prime minister was being challenged in an election by a modernist painter. And the letters page revealed that the British Library is to get copies of recording of 200 voices of the common soldier from 1916 to 1918, ones made by two German academics visiting P.O.W. camps. These will become an auditory cenotaph. Finally there was this, from an American contributor: the gentleman sitting opposite Queen Salote of Tonga in the rain-soaked open carriage at the coronation of 1953 was not her husband but, in fact, His Highness the Sultan of Kelantan. Who knew? Safely home, I wrote in. A caption attributed a 1918 painting to David Nash. *The* David Nash was born in 1945. I said there may be a brother, a painter I've not heard of, but it was more likely they meant Paul or possibly John, brothers and official war artists. David Ritchie, Portland, Oregon------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html