[gmpi] Re: New Reqs 3.8 - Events
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 21:16:58 +0000
On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 07:38:21AM -0800, Tim Hockin wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2003 at 10:34:32AM -0800, Marc Poirier wrote:
> > Yeah, it seems pretty silly to be discussing performance costs of 32 vs.
> > 64 bit for event timestamps. If there's any reason to say that 64-bit
> > timestamps would be useful (which I think has already been shown), then we
> > should just use them. The amount of CPU time that goes to handling
>
> I agree, except that no one has made a case that 32 bit offsets will be less
> useful or that 64 bit absolutes will be more useful.
Quite - I think its a simple matter of use preference. Vote?
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
