[gmpi] Re: New Reqs 3.8 - Events
- From: Tim Hockin <thockin@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:19:20 -0800
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:18:33PM -0800, Chris Grigg wrote:
> Seems like for simplicity it would be way better to have a single
> event timing model, and treat all event types the same way. Since
> timestamping is clearly needed for at least one of these (notes) then
> you'd get that for free for all the other event types. I guess the
Agreed. Ignore them if you don't want to use them in your plugin.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts: