[gmpi] Re: New Reqs 3.8 - Events
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 10:24:10 +0000
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:41:59PM +0100, Frederic Vanmol wrote:
> > if its
> > for (pos = start; pos != end; pos++) (a)
> > then absolute, unsigned 64bit will be easier, but if its
> > for (pos = 0; pos < num_samples; pos++) (b)
> > then we want relative.
> >
>
> Situation (a) can easily be rewritten to use relative timestamps and
> situation
> (b) can easily be rewritten to use absolute timestamps.
>
> Me, I vote for relative.
No question about that, but lets not make things difficult for no good
reason.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
