[gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.1.2
- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 14:39:19 +0100
On Wed, Jun 11, 2003 at 09:16:43 -0400, RonKuper@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >>>
> My reasoning: Sub-modular synths, like SyncC modular, where you design
> your own filters, also support single-sample audio feedback (to make IIR
> Filters). Single-sample processing is beyond GMPI, therefore double
> precision comunication is also out of scope.
> <<<
>
> Why is single-sample processing beyond GMPI? If it lasts as long as MIDI
> has lasted, then you don't think in 5-10 years time we'll all be building
> systems -- on the desktop -- that have single sample latency? We'd better
> be...
But the API would be /totally/ different, it will be more like SyncModular
or MPEG4SA. It becomes very important to eliminate per plugin function
calls for one thing. I think they use some kind of VM system (MPEG4SA
does atleast).
I dont see how its sensible to support those two different methodologies
in one API, you wouldn't be able to use the same source or anything.
- Steve
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
