[gmpi] Re: Decision Time: 7.1.2
- From: Paul Davis <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: gmpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2003 10:01:15 -0400
>But the API would be /totally/ different, it will be more like SyncModular
>or MPEG4SA. It becomes very important to eliminate per plugin function
>calls for one thing. I think they use some kind of VM system (MPEG4SA
>does atleast).
depends on the implementation. i don't think that the standard lays it
down this tightly. i don't know precisely how sfront does things, but
i'm pretty sure it doesn't get to totally eliminate per plugin
function calls. i think its more a case of building plugins out of low
level operations and intelligent (i.e. high-level) optimizing of the
resulting call tree. but yes, its a completely different style of API
from any of the models GMPI is derived from. i don't think you could
take any plugin written for VST/TDM/MAS/RTAS/AU/LADSPA and port it to
the full MPEG4SA spec without totally redesigning it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Generalized Music Plugin Interface (GMPI) public discussion list
Participation in this list is contingent upon your abiding by the
following rules: Please stay on topic. You are responsible for your own
words. Please respect your fellow subscribers. Please do not
redistribute anyone else's words without their permission.
Archive: //www.freelists.org/archives/gmpi
Email gmpi-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx w/ subject "unsubscribe" to unsubscribe
Other related posts:
