[antispam-f] Re: What have they got against Deborah anyway?
- From: Jeremy C B Nicoll <Jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:14:41 +0000 (GMT)
In article <35724d8b4e.Bryn@xxxxx>,
Bryn Evans <antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In a mad moment - Dave Higton mumbled :
> > Rubbish, Jeremy. Deleting on the basis of what the "To:" field
> > either contains, or does not contain, is very useful. A couple of
> > my most successful fields do this.
>
> And I will second that - I have just entered some 60 odd To:s into
> the Divert function at Free-online (PlusNet).
> Brazilians who at some time confused br.york with bryork etc, plus
> Debora and thelatest Just a Letter.
> The result is that these don't even get near my InBox.
> I also have a few Delete To: in my rule file, covering the odd To
> drobe, to Test, to BCF, etc. If these become a nuisance they will get
> 'Diverted' to the Blackhole as well.
I don't understand how you differentiate between these that you delete
and genuine mails with those "To:" field values which you got because
they were BCCed to you.
--
Jeremy C B Nicoll, Edinburgh, Scotland - my opinions are my own.
Other related posts:
