[antispam-f] Re: What have they got against Deborah anyway?
- From: Dave Barnett <as10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2006 09:44:43 GMT
In a recent message Harriet Bazley
<lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10 Nov 2006 as I do recall,
> Richard Porter wrote:
>
>> On 10 Nov 2006 Harriet Bazley wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
>> > Why the spammer is picking on Deborahs I don't know....
>>
>> I hadn't noticed, but I've just looked through my AS_Deleted log and
>> you're right, it's swarming with deborahs! I got 'em all though -
>> windows-1252! :-)
>>
> Sadly I can't afford to do that, as we do have to communicate with
> genuine Windows users... the sort who send messages without a Subject,
> or with a Subject line of "Hi there!", or as a Word attachment without
> any body text, or in HTML format with 300k of added 'stationery'
> graphics....
>
No Deborahs, but plenty of other girls. Perhaps we need a rule to
determine the sex of 'From:' ;-)
Harriet will always be accepted.
--
Dave
Keep GMT all year
Other related posts:
