[antispam-f] Re: What have they got against Deborah anyway?
- From: Steven Pampling <steve.pampling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2006 08:48:45 +0000 (GMT)
On 11 Nov, Harriet Bazley <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11 Nov 2006 as I do recall,
> Richard Porter wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > I'm thinking of doing the same for any subject beginning "hi " and for
> > any subject ending with a smiley.
> >
> Delete Subject: = hi*
> And Message-Id: = *debora*
> Delete Subject: = *:)
> And Message-Id: = *debora*
> are probably pretty safe - I was using rules along those lines until I
> got sick of the way the subjects kept mutating with each batch, with
> only the Deborahs constant....
I didn't really care and used a plain kill on the :)
As a result I haven't noted a debora content to the message-id
I discourage correspondents from doing such things in titles - mainly by
telling everyone I know that such things end up in the spam black hole, no
quarter given.
--
Steve Pampling
Other related posts:
