[antispam-f] What have they got against Deborah anyway?
- From: Harriet Bazley <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 22:38:12 GMT
We have been under massive Debora[h] attack for several days - somebody
is generating messages from a vast number of names all claiming to be
from <deboraholiveir@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<deborars1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <deborajrh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> etc, none
of them actually called "Deborah"! It's got to the stage where I've
finally put in a high-priority block on *any* message with the string
*debora* in the Message-Id: I've checked messages from genuine
Deborahs, and they all seem to use their surnames in the Message-Id
field, if not just 'hotmail.com' etc.
Why the spammer is picking on Deborahs I don't know....
--
H. Bazley
A statement of fact cannot be insolent
Other related posts:
