In a mad moment - Dave Higton mumbled : > > Rubbish, Jeremy. Deleting on the basis of what the "To:" field > either contains, or does not contain, is very useful. A couple > of my most successful fields do this. > And I will second that - I have just entered some 60 odd To:s into the Divert function at Free-online (PlusNet). Brazilians who at some time confused br.york with bryork etc, plus Debora and thelatest Just a Letter. The result is that these don't even get near my InBox. I also have a few Delete To: in my rule file, covering the odd To drobe, to Test, to BCF, etc. If these become a nuisance they will get 'Diverted' to the Blackhole as well. -- |) [ |)ryn [vans mail to - antispam@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.bryork.com/antispam - for annotated example Rules file