See below. Peace, Gman http://www.thevenusproject.com/index.php "The only dumb questions are the ones we fail to ask" ----- Original Message ----- From: "dsw32952" <dsw32952@xxxxxxxxx> To: <pctechtalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Tuesday, June 09, 2009 12:27 AM Subject: -=PCTechTalk=- Re: Partitioning > Oooops. I confused two computers. The third drive is in the Dell, not > the HP. > > Anyway, the settings currently show a green dot for drive C (vista boot > partition) and drive D (data drive) in the No Page File radio button and > no green dot in the button for drive E (XP Pro boot partition). If I > understand correctly that means the page file is currently located on > the XP partition. (drive C and E are partitions on one drive and D is a > separate drive) The two OS's will likely have different locations for their respective pagefiles. Be sure to investigate the settings for each individual OS to be sure where each one os storing their pagefiles before making plans. XP's pagefile will likely be stored on the C: volume and Vista will likely store its copy on the D: drive. Since the D: volume is on a separate physical drive, Vista may instead be storing it elsewhere. > I think I might take about 5GB from the XP partition for a partition to > move the pagefile to. Currently the page file size is 2096MB to 4092 > MB. Recommended size is 4413 MB. Not a bad idea if you can afford the space. > IIRC you said the performance gain in moving the file is minimal > especially if moved to a drive that sees a lot of use. But using a > separate partition on the same drive would save time during defrag. I > gotta go back and find exactly what you said. If it's on the same physical drive, there will be little to no difference in performance. However, if it's stored on its own dedicated volume, it will not become overly fragmented anywhere near as quickly. The only competition for space will be the Recycle Bin and System Restore areas. System Restore should be turned off and the Recycle Bin should be set to the absolute minimum size allowed for that partition within BOTH operating systems. > Again, IIRC at some point somebody said that it would be a good idea to > set your minimum file size to the same number as your maximum file > size.... apparently this would sharply reduce fragmentation of the file > without any performance loss. It will force the pagefile to always remain the same size while will nearly eliminate fragmentation. However, it will also have your system performing less than optimally more often than it would otherwise. This advice was really valid back in the days of Win9x, but not so much within the NT world. NT-based OS's handle the pagefile much better than 9x handled its swapfiles. > Don --------------------------------------------------------------- Please remember to trim your replies (including this sentence and everything below it) and adjust the subject line as necessary. To subscribe, unsubscribe or modify your email settings: //www.freelists.org/webpage/pctechtalk OR To subscribe to the mailing list, send an email to pctechtalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "subscribe" in the Subject. To unsubscribe send email to pctechtalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with "unsubscribe" in the Subject. To access our Archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PCTechTalk/messages/ //www.freelists.org/archives/pctechtalk/ To contact only the PCTT Mod Squad, write to: pctechtalk-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx To join our separate PCTableTalk off-topic group, send a blank email to: pctabletalk+subscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ---------------------------------------------------------------