Alex von Gluck <kallisti5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Maybe a simple vote for everyone who has commit would be sufficient > and > end this debate? A flat text file in trunk in-which each commiter > puts a > username... and +1 git, +1 hg, +1 svn, etc? As long as there are good reasons to choose for hg or git, I don't think we should vote for this - this shouldn't be about taste, but performance. Also, if the tools to use both git/hg over a single repository are reliable, then there is no real need to vote either. So far, I heard good reasons to choose hg over git, but, besides the network problems Andreas mentioned (that Siarzhuk had with git as well, though), I haven't heard anything yet that would make git a better choice than hg. Bye, Axel.