[haiku-development] Re: Proposal: Moving away from Subversion
- From: Ingo Weinhold <ingo_weinhold@xxxxxx>
- To: haiku-development@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:41:18 +0200
On 2010-06-29 at 09:14:28 [+0200], Axel Dörfler <axeld@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Alex von Gluck <kallisti5@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Maybe a simple vote for everyone who has commit would be sufficient
> > and
> > end this debate? A flat text file in trunk in-which each commiter
> > puts a
> > username... and +1 git, +1 hg, +1 svn, etc?
>
> As long as there are good reasons to choose for hg or git, I don't
> think we should vote for this - this shouldn't be about taste, but
> performance. Also, if the tools to use both git/hg over a single
> repository are reliable, then there is no real need to vote either.
I don't quite see how different commit channels can work. What happens in
case of conflicts? Or does a commit operation via any channel create a
common transaction over all repositories?
CU, Ingo
Other related posts:
