Andreas Färber <andreas.faerber@xxxxxx> wrote: > Am 23.06.2010 um 10:14 schrieb Axel Dörfler: > > For me, git is out of the question, not only because of the > > revision > > numbers, but also because of its incredibly bad user interface, > Hm? Anything in particular? > I find the porcelain's implicit use of less very handy, for instance. I am mostly referring to the 130 hard links it clobbers your "bin" directory with. This is just unacceptable non-sense, and hints to an incredible developer stupidity :-) The other part of the bad user interface is not only that the terms differ from what most tools are using (and therefore, most people are used to). If you've read the git vs. hg comparison article recently qouted in this thread, you pretty much get the idea of my critic. > > and > > things like the need to rebuilt its internal database from time to > > time. > Are you referring to the optional git-gc cleanup? You can turn it off > if you don't care about disk space: > http://www.kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-gc.html That's not really an option, and is not something the user should care about at all. It's just bad design, similar to chkdsk kicking in every few boots on an ext3/4 installation; it's a completely unnecessary perfomance killer. Bye, Axel.