On 2010-06-22 at 23:31:06 [+0200], Niels Reedijk <niels.reedijk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Furthermore, I would like to add that this should be a discussion > about which development model we want to have. If we want to stick to > the centralized repository model then subversion really does almost > everything we want. If we want to start experimenting with a less > centralized model (for example with lieutenants), then there are other > options. ATM I don't see much point in changing the development model (I'm open to good arguments, though). However, that does not mean that we cannot move to a distributed VCS nevertheless. svn has annoying issues with merging, which the discussed tools don't, and the distributed VCSs come with nice additional advantages (local repositories). CU, Ingo