[geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question
- From: "Jack Lewis" <jandj.lewis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 8 Aug 2004 14:55:10 +0100
----- Original Message -----
From: "Philip" <joyphil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <geocentrism@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2004 2:53 AM
Subject: [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question
>Philip said:
> I will try to give a logical example.
>
> In the beginning there was nothing. An empty void. and nothing in it. From
> outside I who am nothing but a spirit of great power, saw this nothing,
this
> empty void, so I made a beautiful stone, and I placed it in this void. I
> gave it no movement , and so it niether moved up nor down nor in any
> direction from this place where I put it. I saw that it was still and that
> it was good.
Jack says:
Is this the Earth or the Sun or are you saying it doesn't matter?
Snip
> This is the possible inertialess frame which only I as a spirit can
> contemplate, and know that it has no movement. Then I thought, this stone
is
> alone. Perhaps it would look even better if I gave it a companion. So I
made
> another stone even more beautiful than the first, placing it not too far
> from the first. And I gave an impulse to this stone that it rotated in its
> place.
Do you mean on its axis and if so why would you want to do that?
If you mean as an orbit, on this forum it matters which is which, geo or
helio?
Jack Lewis
Other related posts:
