Posts for geocentrism, 08-2004

Browse: Last Month: 07-2004 Main Archive Page Next Month: 09-2004

» [geocentrism] A few comments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Jerusalem and flower paterns -
» [geocentrism] Jerusalem and flower paterns -
» [geocentrism] Fibonacci -
» [geocentrism] Fibonacci and the flower patern -
» [geocentrism] Subject -
» [geocentrism] Fibonacci Flower Pattern discussion -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Intellectual dishonesty -
» [geocentrism] Re: Intellectual dishonesty -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Intellectual dishonesty -
» [geocentrism] Intellectual dishonesty -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Bye, bye, Vegemike -
» [geocentrism] Re: Announcements -
» [geocentrism] Gravity Probe B -
» [geocentrism] Announcements -
» [geocentrism] Re: Satellites and TV -
» [geocentrism] Re: Galileo -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Goodbye. Please Unsubscribe. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Satellites and TV -
» [geocentrism] Re: Satellites and TV -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Galileo -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Space probes beyond LEO were all fake -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Holiday -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: I looked in -
» [geocentrism] Re: I looked in -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: I looked in -
» [geocentrism] evolution/geocentrism -
» [geocentrism] Re: I looked in -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: Mumbo-Jumbo -
» [geocentrism] Website -
» [geocentrism] Re: I looked in -
» [geocentrism] Re: I looked in -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: The speed of light -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Progress? -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Removal -
» [geocentrism] Re: Mumbo-Jumbo -
» [geocentrism] I looked in -
» [geocentrism] Re: NASA Photos -
» [geocentrism] Re: Knowledge is NOT intelligence. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Removal -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: Nasa Photo -
» [geocentrism] Re: NASA Photos -
» [geocentrism] The speed of light -
» [geocentrism] Re: Nasa Photo -
» [geocentrism] Re: Nasa Photo -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: Removal -
» [geocentrism] Mumbo-Jumbo -
» [geocentrism] Re: stones on a string. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Knowledge is NOT intelligence. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] stones on a string. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Knowledge is NOT intelligence. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: The aether.geocehtrism -
» [geocentrism] Re: The aether.geocehtrism -
» [geocentrism] Re: Removal -
» [geocentrism] Re: Knowledge is NOT intelligence. -
» [geocentrism] Re: The aether.geocehtrism -
» [geocentrism] space travel...UFO -
» [geocentrism] Re: The aether.geocehtrism -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Knowledge is NOT intelligence. -
» [geocentrism] Re: The aether.geocehtrism -
» [geocentrism] Re: This List? -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Aether for Mike -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] Re: Steves lost in cyberspace input -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] Removal -
» [geocentrism] Knowledge is NOT intelligence. -
» [geocentrism] This List? -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] The aether.geocehtrism -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] Re: another apology correction -
» [geocentrism] Re: Still futile arguments. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] Fw: Aether for Mike -
» [geocentrism] Fw: Re: Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] Re: Steves lost in cyberspace input -
» [geocentrism] Re: Nasa Photo -
» [geocentrism] Re: Nasa Photo -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] Re: dopp;er... -
» [geocentrism] Re: Steves lost in cyberspace input -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: mathmatical illogic -
» [geocentrism] Re: mathmatical illogic -
» [geocentrism] Re: another apology correction -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] dopp;er... -
» [geocentrism] Re: mathmatical illogic -
» [geocentrism] Fw: Nasa Photo -
» [geocentrism] Fw: Re: Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] Re: reversing the evidence -
» [geocentrism] Re: On rf propagation. -
» [geocentrism] Re: reversing the evidence -
» [geocentrism] Re: mathmatical illogic -
» [geocentrism] On rf propagation. -
» [geocentrism] Re: another apology correction -
» [geocentrism] Re: reversing the evidence -
» [geocentrism] Re: Still futile arguments. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Nasa Photo -
» [geocentrism] Re: NASA Photos -
» [geocentrism] Re: NASA Photos -
» [geocentrism] reversing the evidence -
» [geocentrism] Re: Nasa Photo -
» [geocentrism] mathmatical illogic -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] Re: Dynamic equivalents. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Still futile arguments. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: Fw: Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Does the "center" hold? -
» [geocentrism] Re: Steves lost in cyberspace input -
» [geocentrism] Re: another apology correction -
» [geocentrism] Re: Dynamic equivalents. -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: Dynamic equivalents. -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: NASA Photos -
» [geocentrism] Dynamic equivalents. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Einstein's assumptions. -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] NASA Photos -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Does the "center" hold? -
» [geocentrism] Re: Nasa Photo -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: Fw: Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: Dynamic equivalents. -
» [geocentrism] Nasa Photo -
» [geocentrism] Re: Newton v Einstein -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: Nasa Photo -
» [geocentrism] Re: Dynamic equivalents. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Einstein's assumptions. -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: The NASA photo -
» [geocentrism] The flood and the Ressurection -
» [geocentrism] Einstein's assumptions. -
» [geocentrism] The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: Dynamic equivalents. -
» [geocentrism] The NASA photo -
» [geocentrism] Still futile arguments. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Dynamic equivalents. -
» [geocentrism] Fw: Re: Fw: Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: Nasa Photo -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: Dynamic equivalents. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Fw: Does the "center" hold? -
» [geocentrism] Fw: Airy and the telescope... -
» [geocentrism] Fw: Re: Fw: Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Steves lost in cyberspace input -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] another apology correction -
» [geocentrism] Re: Airy's Experiment -
» [geocentrism] Re: Newton v Einstein -
» [geocentrism] Re: Dynamic equivalents. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Nasa Photo -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Falsification of a theory -
» [geocentrism] Airy's Experiment -
» [geocentrism] Newton v Einstein -
» [geocentrism] Dynamic equivalents. -
» [geocentrism] Re: The lack of scientific integrity -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: The lack of scientific integrity -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Subjects -
» [geocentrism] New Members -
» [geocentrism] Re: The lack of scientific integrity -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: apology fruitless debate. -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: (no subject) -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fw: Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Fw: Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: The lack of scientific integrity -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: The lack of scientific integrity -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Fw: Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Challenge Jack Lewis -
» [geocentrism] The lack of scientific integrity -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: More on aberration -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: More on aberration -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: fruitless debate -
» [geocentrism] Re: More on aberration -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: apology fruitless debate. -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: Voyager -
» [geocentrism] Re: apology fruitless debate. -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] fruitless debate -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] More on aberration -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: apology fruitless debate. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: apology fruitless debate. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: Einstein -
» [geocentrism] apology fruitless debate. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: Einstein -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] The honesty of scientists -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: Einstein -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Einstein -
» [geocentrism] For Mike -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: The Sun/ Comment & question -
» [geocentrism] Re: (no subject) -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Proof that the earth is moving -
» [geocentrism] Re: A bone thrown in. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: A bone thrown in. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Immobile World. Is it important -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: A bone thrown in. -
» [geocentrism] Proof that the earth is moving -
» [geocentrism] Re: For Alan -
» [geocentrism] Re: For Alan -
» [geocentrism] A bone thrown in. -
» [geocentrism] Fw: [CL-UK] Solar System could be 'unique' -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: For Alan -
» [geocentrism] Re: For Alan -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Immobile World. Is it important -
» [geocentrism] Re: need help -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: need help -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: For Alan -
» [geocentrism] Re: need help -
» [geocentrism] Re: need help -
» [geocentrism] Re: need help -
» [geocentrism] Re: Immobile World. Is it important -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] need help -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Science and modernism -
» [geocentrism] For Alan -
» [geocentrism] Re: Science and modernism -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Science and modernism -
» [geocentrism] Immobile World. Is it important -
» [geocentrism] Re: Science and modernism -
» [geocentrism] Re: This is what the crowd have come to see. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Catching up -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Science and modernism -
» [geocentrism] Re: Tone. -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Catching up -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Tone. -
» [geocentrism] Break -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Catching up -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Catching up -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Catching up -
» [geocentrism] Re: Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: Catching up -
» [geocentrism] Re: Catching up -
» [geocentrism] Catching up -
» [geocentrism] Fruitless arguments -
» [geocentrism] Re: This is what the crowd have come to see. -
» [geocentrism] Re: This is what the crowd have come to see. -
» [geocentrism] Re: This is what the crowd have come to see. -
» [geocentrism] Re: This is what the crowd have come to see. -
» [geocentrism] This is what the crowd have come to see. -
» [geocentrism] separating the authors in comments. -
» [geocentrism] Re: (no subject) -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: (no subject) -
» [geocentrism] Re: Tone. -
» [geocentrism] Re: (no subject) -
» [geocentrism] Re: (no subject) -
» [geocentrism] Re: (no subject) -
» [geocentrism] Re: (no subject) -
» [geocentrism] Re: Tone./congrats/ -
» [geocentrism] Re: Tone./congrats/ -
» [geocentrism] Re: (no subject) -
» [geocentrism] Re: (no subject) -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Challenge -
» [geocentrism] Re: Negative parallax -
» [geocentrism] Re: Tone. -