--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gordon Swobe <wittrsamr@...> wrote: > Stuart, > > Let us say we construct a real Chinese room. We place Dennett in the room and > pass him some Chinese symbols. > > The system we call "Daniel Dennett" then manipulates the symbols while > employing the full resources of his putative "system property of > consciousness" in an attempt to understand those symbols. But of course he > fails to understand them. > > It would seem then that on Dennett's own account, Dennett has an implicit > belief in Cartesian dualism. > > -gts Huh? Dennett argues that the system is what counts and that Dennett-in-the-room would not be the system that counted. How is that to evidence "an implicit belief in Cartesian dualism"? SWM ========================================= Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/