[Wittrs] Re: What Is Ontological Dualism?

  • From: "SWM" <SWMirsky@xxxxxxx>
  • To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Wed, 07 Apr 2010 02:00:55 -0000

--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gordon Swobe <wittrsamr@...> wrote:

> Stuart,
>
> Let us say we construct a real Chinese room. We place Dennett in the room and 
> pass him some Chinese symbols.
>
> The system we call "Daniel Dennett" then manipulates the symbols while 
> employing the full resources of his putative "system property of 
> consciousness" in an attempt to understand those symbols. But of course he 
> fails to understand them.
>
> It would seem then that on Dennett's own account, Dennett has an implicit 
> belief in Cartesian dualism.
>

> -gts

Huh? Dennett argues that the system is what counts and that Dennett-in-the-room 
would not be the system that counted. How is that to evidence "an implicit 
belief in Cartesian dualism"?

SWM

=========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/

Other related posts: